«  Cuil Main Google gets a little less opaque  »


I used Google Trends to compare search volume for John McCain and a rash.

Here is what I found.

McCainvsRash.jpg


Apparently, rashes are almost as popular as McCain in Austin, Texas. And Australians are much more concerned about rashes than McCain.

Now, please note that what I have done is really stupid. This graph shows nothing. It means nothing.

I wonder whether analyzing search term popularity means anything at all. After all, today Luther Campbell of 2 Live Crew got a bit bump in searches. Why? He got married. Yawn.

Apparently, lawyers are trying to introduce Google Trends data into trial evidence and political campaigns are trying to analyze it to capture some sort of "zeitgeist."

Would anyone try to convince me that Google Trends is anything but stupid? Does it really offer insight into our concerns, curiosities, and values? Can someone out there construct a responsible and interesting table using Google Trends?


Here are some other stupid searches:

I am nowhere close to being "bigger than Jesus."

SivavsJesus.jpg

And if you ever wondered about that eternal question the kids asked in Stand by Me: "Who would win, Superman or Mighty Mouse?" Superman. Big time.

SupermanvsMightyMouse.jpg


And, if you are fan of Broadway musicals, I am sure you have always wondered:

sharksvsjets.jpg


arrow

Comments (3)

Apparently, lawyers are trying to introduce Google Trends data into trial evidence

do you have any citations/links to illustrate this? I find it to be totally insane and would love to know more details.

Yeah. See here:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080624-orgies-and-apple-pie-google-trends-used-in-obscenity-case.html

It should be a commonplace already for the analysis of any word or name frequency: The most used words are the least meaningful. So of course the most popular searches are the most trivial.

Post a comment

We had to crank up the spam filter so it may take a little while to appear. Thanks.

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

A book in progress by

Siva Vaidhyanathan

Siva Vaidhyanathan

This blog, the result of a collaboration between myself and the Institute for the Future of the Book, is dedicated to exploring the process of writing a critical interpretation of the actions and intentions behind the cultural behemoth that is Google, Inc. The book will answer three key questions: What does the world look like through the lens of Google?; How is Google's ubiquity affecting the production and dissemination of knowledge?; and how has the corporation altered the rules and practices that govern other companies, institutions, and states? [more]

» Send links, questions and ideas:
siva [at] googlizationofeverything [dot] com

» To reach me for a press query, please write to SIVAMEDIA ut POBOX dut COM

» To reach me for a speaking invitation, please write to SIVASPEAK ut POBOX dut COM

» Visit my main blog: SIVACRACY.NET

» More about me

Topics

Like the Mind of God (57 posts)

All the World's Information (75 posts)

What If Big Ads Don't Work (20 posts)

Don't Be Evil (16 posts)

Is Google a Library? (84 posts)

Challenging Big Media (46 posts)

The Dossier (49 posts)

Global Google (26 posts)

Google Earth (6 posts)

A Public Utility? (37 posts)

About this Book (28 posts)

RSS Feed icon  RSS Feed


Powered by Movable Type 3.35